[csaa-forum] FW: ::fibreculture:: The politics of emotion / Aspirations in the suburbs

[Ian Stuart]

Maybe Kath and Kim is not such a sendup/comedy after all?

Ian Stuart

>>> Sally.Scott at curtin.edu.au 11/10/2004 6:13:38 p.m. >>>


I can't help but think that Australia is dominated by the Freedom
Furniture
Flunkies who can't think beyond Macro-suede couches, fake mohair throws
and
fondue sets.

Sally 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: csaa-forum-bounces at darlin.cdu.edu.au 
[mailto:csaa-forum-bounces at darlin.cdu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Danny Butt
Sent: Monday, 11 October 2004 12:55 PM
To: csaa-forum
Subject: [csaa-forum] FW: ::fibreculture:: The politics of emotion /
Aspirations in the suburbs

Hi all,

I can imagine most of the Australians on this list are in a state of
shock
:7, but nevertheless I'd be interested to hear the on-the-ground
reactions
to the, uh, "commanding" performance by Howard over the weekend, and
what it
means for Australian culture or its study. I hope Brett doesn't mind
me
forwarding this from Fibreculture, but it was one of the most
insightful
discussions I've come across - relevant to this group, and worthy of
wider
exposure. There are also some parallels to be drawn in the prevailing
political mood perhaps with the terribly sad news of Derrida - I'm
thinking
of the awful attacks on his work from Chomsky, the Cambridge people
etc.
that seem motivated by a similar register of fear that Howard plays
upon so
ruthlessly. Being good, or right, is obviously less important than
being
familiar.

------ Forwarded Message
From: Brett Neilson <b.neilson at uws.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 11:48:46 +1000
To: <fibreculture at lists.myspinach.org>
Subject: ::fibreculture:: Sad news overnight

Sad news overnight, the death of Jacques Derrida.

On that other altogether more tired and predictable business, I'll post
a
piece (written a few days back) that was published in the Italian
newspaper
_Il Manifesto_ yesterday, 9 October.

Available in Italian at:
http://www.ilmanifesto.it/Quotidiano-archivio/09-Ottobre-2004/art42.html



There's another sum-up piece that I wrote last night, but I'll post
that
when it's published in a few days time.



The politics of emotion.
Aspirations in the suburbs. And ours?

BRETT NEILSON

It would be foolish to believe that an election in Australia could
alter
the current course of global power. Nor does anyone in Australia
seriously
expect that a change of government would change life on the ground much
at
all. Yet, at the international level, the contest between Howard and
Latham
(due to be decided on 9 October) could have effects as significant of
those
of the Spanish election of March 2004. If the Labor Party candidate,
Mark
Latham, wins, the 800 or so Australian troops in Iraq will be withdrawn
by
Christmas. This would be the first withdrawal by a
coalition-of-the-willing
country that has been in Iraq since the beginning of the current
U.S.-led
invasion. But nobody in Australia is discussing this possibility, least
of
all Latham himself. Rather, the talk is about the traditional issues
that
divide the political parties in Australia: health, education, taxes,
interest rates, and economic management. Like the question of refugees
and
border control, which virtually decided the last election, the issue of
war
has disappeared in the last days of the campaign, overshadowed by
domestic
issues and cynical attempts to micro-reward swing voters.

The reticence of the Labor Party to advertise its policy on Iraq, like
its
kinder approach to refugees, stems from its attempt to win back a
number of
marginal seats, usually located on the fringes of Australia's cities.
These
largely working class areas had always voted Labor, at least until
1996
when they voted for the conservative John Howard, who has maintained a
stronghold on national politics ever since. Often dubbed the
'aspirational
classes,' the populace of these areas is typically disinvested in the
processes of representative democracy, concerned about their
opportunities
for social and economic betterment, susceptible to the affective claims
of
nationalism, and harsh in their attitudes to refugees (although many
were
migrants to Australia themselves). The moderate Latham, 43 years-old
and
Australia's closest answer to a third-way politician, himself grew up
in
one of these areas: the vast suburban sprawl of Western Sydney. And
his
predominant rhetoric, which speaks of erecting a 'ladder of
opportunity'
for all Australians, appeals to these 'aspirational' values. Tuned to
the
findings of focus groups and opinion polls, Latham's message has
gradually
been stripped of all reference to the war, border control, or
contentious
issues such as gay marriage. And the result is boring politics, a
campaign
of social engineering (with the promised expenditures carefully matched
by
Howard at every step) that has failed to capture the attention (let
alone
the imagination) of the voters.

The problem for Labor is how to win back the 'aspirational' suburban
seats
without alienating their other base: the middle class, university
educated
constituencies who generally live closer to the city centres. These
groups
also deserted the Labor Party in the election of November 2001,
fleeing
mainly to the Greens (a party allied to the likes of Daniel Cohn Bendit
and
Joshka Fischer) when Kim Beasley, the former Labor leader, attempted
to
match Howard's rhetoric on security and border control in the wake of
11
September. But this time around, the desertion to the Greens is
unlikely to
affect only the Labor vote. There are also many people who live in
affluent
conservative seats who are threatening to vote Green to protest
Howard's
pro-Bush stance on the war, refusal to sign the Kyoto protocol, and
brutal
treatment of asylum seekers. Derisively labeled 'doctors' wives' by
conservative spin doctors, these voters are unlikely to shift the
balance
of power in the lower house. But they do threaten to give the Greens
more
leverage in the upper house, a factor that would make life difficult
for
the major party that wins office (so much so that Howard has struck a
deal
with the Christianity-based party Family First to minimize this
effect).

It is at this level that the contest in Australia is most interesting.
Not
because the policies of the Greens, which often take the form of an
anti-Americanism with strong nationalist/protectionist implications,
are
particularly novel, but because the hate that circulates for Howard,
and in
particular for his position on Iraq, is the strongest emotional force
that
traverses the electorate. Such feeling is unlikely to pierce through
the
elaborate apparatus of image construction, swing vote capture, and
focus
group policy-making that has become the disease of majoritarian
politics.
But it carries a lesson, even for those of us committed to a
post-representative democracy that does not take the seizure of
political
power at the level of the nation-state as its primary objective. If
Latham
is unlikely to win, it is not because his message fails to resonate
with
the 'aspirational' voters he has targeted. Rather it is because, in a
media
saturated culture, the emotional modulation of voters tends to
outweigh
their openness to arguments of truth and falsity. Fear, insecurity,
and
precariousness are the order of the day. And this is what the
conservative
side of politics, in Australia as elsewhere, has manipulated through a
skilful exploitation of the relations between sense and sensitivity. If
the
left is to respond, it must find something more than a leader who can
win a
debate but is unable to win an election.



Free Trade in the Bermuda Triangle ... and Other Tales of
Counterglobalization
http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/N/neilson_free.html 

  


::posted on ::fibreculture:: mailinglist for australasian
::critical internet theory, culture and research
::(un) subscribe info and archive: http://www.fibreculture.org 
::please send announcements to separate mailinglist:
::
http://lists.myspinach.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fibreculture-announce


------ End of Forwarded Message


_______________________________________

csaa-forum
discussion list of the cultural studies association of australasia

www.csaa.asn.au 
_______________________________________

csaa-forum
discussion list of the cultural studies association of australasia

www.csaa.asn.au
CAUTION: This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain information that 
is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient,you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying 
of this message or data is prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify help at eit.ac.nz immediately and delete all material pertaining to
this e-mail. Thank you.