[csaa-forum] a possible letter from CSAA about the Howard/Brough intervention
Paul.Magee
Paul.Magee at canberra.edu.au
Sat Jul 7 17:25:09 CST 2007
Dear All,
Sorry to take a while to respond to the suggestion of a CSAA letter to Howard/Rudd; Ive been on hols. As President this would be an appropriate thing for me to do. Yet much as I appreciate Stephens suggestion, backed up by a few people now, Im disinclined to follow it up. This is for a number of reasons:
The first, is that Im not convinced that such a letter, to either leader, would have any impact on their actions. Thats not an overwhelming reason, however, as it might still be a good thing for us as an association to take public stands.
The real reason is that I dont think unanimity is the best place for us to be at the moment. Partially this is because I dont believe we actually have unanimity on this issue. I mean, I could write a letter against the intervention, but then again, Im got some pretty weird ideas, as many of you know. Im not sure youd all want me putting the name of your association to them. I might sound trite here, but actually this is precisely my point. If I were to draft the sort of document that averaged out the opinions of all of us, I think wed lose much of the value of what we, as Cultural Studies scholars, have to offer on this, or any other political issue the freedom and experience to say, from an informed perspective, exactly what one thinks. We, as a discipline, have allowed freedom of expression more than most others and it often produces exciting work. On the other hand, I dont think weve ever done consensus particularly well. Not that weve tried all that often. Its not what were trained for.
I think we should particularly avoid unanimity when it comes to a wedge issue designed, as Mark pointed out, to make firm stances appear foolish. Id rather we treat this association as a space in which we disagree on and debate over issues that are contentious, precisely on the grounds that we dont necessarily have all these things in common. In other words, I think the CSAA should be a space for risky thinking seeing what happens when you throw an idea that youve thought long and hard on out there. Im delighted that CSAA forum has taken on this character over the last week. Here's to disagreement, and feedack!
I think that the real possibility for political action for CSAA members at this particular moment is much closer to hand than Parliament House. The elections looming and we, those of us who are teachers in particular, have a very real capacity to have impact upon one of the Howard governments most vulnerable support bases: the young. I wont rehearse the distressing statistics on Australian youths support of the Co-alition. Id rather focus on the fact that were in a very good position to make them think very hard about it. Maggie Nolans suggestion, on this list, that we incorporate issues like Mal Brough into our teaching strikes me as a great one. Teaching that way is risky of course, cause you can often, in the heat of the issue, get the facts wrong, and you can also often fall into the trap of preaching, when the real challenge is to persuade people to think. Thats also where I think the politics of this list come into play. The discussions and disagreements we have in spaces like this list inform our teaching, not to mention our general interaction with other minds. So too can the valuable resources people have been putting forward all week. This is a good thing - though the issue itself, like so many Howard issues, is so distressing and many of the political manouvres are so disgraceful. We should be confronting them. CS has been far too reticent in the past with notable exceptions of course about applying its various methodologies and expertises to Australian parliamentary politics. Maybe we took Foucaults comments about the Head of the King in the History of Sexuality too seriously. Or maybe we shied away from what is an inherently risky endeavour. Either way, I want to call - in lieu of a letter to politicians who cant read - for us to use this forum as a space for discussion of each and every upcoming political ploy over the next few months. Id particularly like to see people sending in more links to good resources.
This is where we do our real political work, right here in the so called ivory walls. They're not any more. The democratisation of the Australian university system, these last 30 years (we've gone from 2% of school leavers attending Uni, to something more like 30%), has also vastly increased our potential political power. Let's focus it.
In sum, I suggest we fly under the radar, and rely on the fact that the true politicians are the teachers, 'cause they're closer to the future.
best
Paul
Dr. Paul Magee
President, Cultural Studies Association of Australasia
Lecturer in Creative Reading
School of Creative Communication
University of Canberra
ACT 2601
02 6201 2402
Australian Government Higher Education (CRICOS)
Registered Provider number: #00212K
More information about the csaa-forum
mailing list